Workers Union essays

Workers Union essays 1. I do not believe that it is wrong for companies to replace striking workers. If it was against the law to replace those workers, different companies would have employees going on strike everyday. I understand that there are some circumstances where a company may not be paying their employees enough to get by, but there are employees out there that would go on strike just because they want, not need, but want more money. I believe that if the replacement workers are doing a better job than the former employees, and they are satisfied with the pay, then why not hire them permanently? 2. Of course, the first negative that comes to mind when you think of replacing strike workers is the fact that there are going to more people added to the unemployed list if you replace the strike workers. Some companies may lose profit from potential customers if the customers feel like the company does not care for their employees. And, like in Firestones case, if the new employees do not do as good of a job, the products being produced may be of lesser quality. 3. When a union goes on strike, the workers on strike lose their pay for whatever time period they are on strike. They also face the chance of losing their job permanently. The companies may have to eventually give in to the strike losing profit, and as I said in question 2, customers may see the company differently, and if they replace the workers permanently, the products may be of lesser quality. 4. Would I cross a picket line and fill the job of a striking worker? The first thing that comes to my mind is the strikes in baseball. Its just ridiculous. Baseball players get a minimum of $250,000 a year. Thats the minimum, and if you cant live on that, you are out of your mind. Most teams only have one or two guys on the roster that are getting paid that little. In this circumstance, yes I would cross a picket line in a heartbeat. I wouldnt ...